Timea Babos vs Richel Hogenkamp Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Babos vs Hogenkamp analysis and find out who is favored!
Timea Babos vs Richel Hogenkamp Important H2H Prediction Stats:
Head-to-head: Babos 2 - 0 Hogenkamp
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Babos has won 46.08% of points on their second serve, while Hogenkamp has won 0%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Babos, in recent form, has won 50.91% of their opponent's second serve points, while Hogenkamp has won 0%. The same stats for first serve returns are 38.23% and 0% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Babos has saved 58.33% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Hogenkamp has saved 0% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Babos has won 50.94% of matches played (W/L 27/ 26), with Hogenkamp winning 0% (W/L 0/ 0) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Babos has their best career surface win % on I.hard, winning 68% (W/L 82/ 39), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 43% (W/L 24/ 32). Hogenkamp has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 62% (W/L 215/ 132), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 42% (W/L 14/ 19).
- Player level: In the last year, Babos has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 55.88% of matches (W/L 19/ 15), where as Hogenkamp has played most of their matches on the , winning 0% of matches (W/L / ). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 2 times before with Babos winning 2 times and Hogenkamp being victorious 0 times. They have played 4 sets in total, with Babos winning 4 and Hogenkamp winning 0. The last match between Babos and Hogenkamp was at the U.S. Open - New York, 01-09-2016, Second, Hard with Timea Babos getting the victory 6-2 6-4.
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 0:38:30.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Babos and Hogenkamp have played a deciding set 0 times, with Babos winning 0 times and Hogenkamp 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 0 tiebreaks against each other with Babos winning 0, and Hogenkamp 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Babos has played against opponents with an average rank of 219.02 while Hogenkamp has played against players with an average rank of .
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Babos has won 52% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Hogenkamp has won 0% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Babos has converted 42.06% of breakpoint opportunities, and Hogenkamp has converted 0% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
19
Total
0
Mast
13
Chall
0
Slam
3
Main
3
Minor
239
Rank
25
High
31
Age
R
Plays
2
Total0
2
Hard0
0
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
896
Rank
94
High
32
Age
R
Plays
16
Total
0
Mast
12
Chall
0
Slam
0
Main
4
Minor
Form
57% (434-334)
Career Total W/L
59% (414-282)
56% (14-11)
YTD W/L
0% (0-0)
$1,941,606
Career Prize Money
$542,444
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
stats | Timea Babos | Richel Hogenkamp |
---|---|---|
All H2H Matches | 2 | 0 |
Sets Won | 4 | 0 |
Games Won | 24 | 11 |
Aces (Total) | 6 | 0 |
DFs (Total) | 3 | 6 |
Avg Match Time | 0:38:30 | 0:38:30 |
1st Serve % | 60% (29/48) | 60% (41/68) |
1st Serve Win% | 83% (24/29) | 54% (22/41) |
2nd Serve Win% | 47% (9/19) | 44% (12/27) |
BPs Won% (Total) | 56% (5/9) | 50% (2/4) |
Return Points W% | 50% (34/68) | 31% (15/48) |
Best of 3 Sets W% | 100% (2/2) | 0% (0/2) |
Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Deciding Set Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
1st set W, W | 100% (2/2) | 0% (0/0) |
1st set W, L | 0% (2/0) | 0% (0/0) |
1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (2/0) |
Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
6-2 6-4 |
Timea Babos
Player
Richel Hogenkamp
60%
(
29 of
48)
1st Serve %
60%
(
41 of
68)
6
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
6
83%
(
24 of
29)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
22 of
41)
47%
(
9 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
12 of
27)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
31%
(
15 of
48)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
34 of
68)
67
Total Points Won
49
|
||||
6-2 6-3 |
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
stats | Timea Babos | Richel Hogenkamp |
---|---|---|
YTD W/L | 56% (14/11) | 0% (0/0) |
Sets Win/Loss | 55% (31/25) | 0% (0/0) |
Games Win/Loss | 51% (279/269) | 0% (0/0) |
Hard Win/Loss | 50% (4/4) | 0% (0/0) |
Clay Win/Loss | 54% (7/6) | 0% (0/0) |
Indoor Hard W/L | 75% (3/1) | 0% (0/0) |
Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Aces pg | 0.32 | 0 |
Aces Total | 86 | 0 |
DFs per game | 0.39 | 0 |
DFs Total | 105 | 0 |
Avg Match Time | 1:54:7 | 1st Match |
Avg Opp Rank | 228.48 | 0 |
1st Serve % | 63% (1142/1807) | 0% (0/0) |
1st Serve W% | 64% (733/1142) | 0% (0/0) |
2nd Serve W% | 46% (304/665) | 0% (0/0) |
BPs Won% Total | 42% (97/229) | 0% (0/0) |
Return Pts W% | 43% (787/1833) | 0% (0/0) |
Slam W/L | 33% (1/2) | 0% (0/0) |
Masters W/L | 50% (2/2) | 0% (0/0) |
Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Main Tour W/L | 60% (3/2) | 0% (0/0) |
Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Challenger W/L | 62% (8/5) | 0% (0/0) |
Futures W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Best of 3 Sets W% | 54% (13/24) | 0% (0/0) |
Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
TBs Win% (Total) | 33% (2/6) | 0% (0/0) |
Deciding Set W% | 43% (3/7) | 0% (0/0) |
1st set W, W | 81% (16/13) | 0% (0/0) |
1st set W, L | 19% (16/3) | 0% (0/0) |
1st set L, W | 11% (9/1) | 0% (0/0) |
Timea Babos Recent Matches Played
opponent | Score | H2H | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Q2 |
Astra Sharma
Player
Timea Babos
54%
(
33 of
61)
1st Serve %
52%
(
33 of
64)
7
Aces
1
6
Double Faults
6
79%
(
26 of
33)
1st Serve Won
76%
(
25 of
33)
57%
(
16 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
12 of
31)
100%
(
3 of
3)
Break Points Won
14%
(
1 of
7)
31%
(
19 of
61)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
27 of
64)
69
Total Points Won
56
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
Q1 |
Timea Babos
Player
Nuria Parrizas-Diaz
67%
(
38 of
57)
1st Serve %
75%
(
48 of
64)
3
Aces
0
6
Double Faults
1
68%
(
26 of
38)
1st Serve Won
46%
(
22 of
48)
47%
(
9 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
8 of
16)
60%
(
6 of
10)
Break Points Won
80%
(
4 of
5)
39%
(
22 of
57)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
34 of
64)
69
Total Points Won
52
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
QF |
Iva Jovic
Player
Timea Babos
55%
(
36 of
66)
1st Serve %
56%
(
36 of
64)
3
Aces
4
2
Double Faults
6
75%
(
27 of
36)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
23 of
36)
57%
(
17 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
12 of
28)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
33%
(
22 of
66)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
29 of
64)
73
Total Points Won
57
|
7-5 6-4 | H2H | ||
R2 |
Timea Babos
Player
Sophie Chang
69%
(
46 of
67)
1st Serve %
60%
(
41 of
68)
2
Aces
2
7
Double Faults
8
67%
(
31 of
46)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
24 of
41)
29%
(
6 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
30%
(
8 of
27)
46%
(
6 of
13)
Break Points Won
27%
(
3 of
11)
45%
(
30 of
67)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
36 of
68)
73
Total Points Won
62
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Timea Babos
Player
Allie Kiick
40%
(
2 of
5)
1st Serve %
53%
(
8 of
15)
2
Aces
0
-
Double Faults
-
100%
(
2 of
2)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
4 of
8)
67%
(
2 of
3)
2nd Serve Won
14%
(
1 of
7)
100%
(
2 of
2)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
20%
(
1 of
5)
Rtn Points Won
67%
(
10 of
15)
14
Total Points Won
6
|
3-0 ret. | H2H | ||
QF |
Kathinka Von Deichmann
Player
Timea Babos
78%
(
56 of
72)
1st Serve %
72%
(
54 of
75)
-
Aces
-
4
Double Faults
3
64%
(
36 of
56)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
28 of
54)
50%
(
8 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
7 of
21)
36%
(
5 of
14)
Break Points Won
38%
(
3 of
8)
39%
(
28 of
72)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
40 of
75)
84
Total Points Won
63
|
7-6(2) 6-2 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Timea Babos
Player
Victoria Osuigwe
63%
(
41 of
65)
1st Serve %
68%
(
55 of
81)
1
Aces
0
6
Double Faults
6
76%
(
31 of
41)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
32 of
55)
42%
(
10 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
10 of
26)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
37%
(
24 of
65)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
39 of
81)
80
Total Points Won
66
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
R2 |
Timea Babos
Player
Sophie Chang
64%
(
54 of
85)
1st Serve %
61%
(
46 of
75)
1
Aces
4
7
Double Faults
7
59%
(
32 of
54)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
23 of
46)
48%
(
15 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
12 of
29)
40%
(
6 of
15)
Break Points Won
30%
(
3 of
10)
45%
(
38 of
85)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
40 of
75)
87
Total Points Won
73
|
7-5 6-3 | H2H | ||
QF |
Fiona Ferro
Player
Timea Babos
74%
(
54 of
73)
1st Serve %
72%
(
36 of
50)
2
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
2
59%
(
32 of
54)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
21 of
36)
68%
(
13 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
14%
(
2 of
14)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
15%
(
2 of
13)
38%
(
28 of
73)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
27 of
50)
72
Total Points Won
51
|
6-4 6-1 | H2H | ||
Q1 |
Timea Babos
Player
Margaux Rouvroy
69%
(
49 of
71)
1st Serve %
75%
(
55 of
73)
1
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
4
69%
(
34 of
49)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
36 of
55)
59%
(
13 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
7 of
18)
36%
(
4 of
11)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
34%
(
24 of
71)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
30 of
73)
77
Total Points Won
67
|
6-4 7-5 | H2H |
view more
Richel Hogenkamp Recent Matches Played
opponent | Score | H2H | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
R2 |
Guiomar Zuleta De Reales
Player
Richel Hogenkamp
59%
(
41 of
69)
1st Serve %
53%
(
43 of
81)
7
Aces
2
4
Double Faults
9
88%
(
36 of
41)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
26 of
43)
50%
(
14 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
19 of
38)
38%
(
3 of
8)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
28%
(
19 of
69)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
36 of
81)
86
Total Points Won
64
|
7-6(8) 6-2 | H2H | ||
Q1 |
Olivia Gadecki
Player
Richel Hogenkamp
69%
(
36 of
52)
1st Serve %
59%
(
32 of
54)
7
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
2
78%
(
28 of
36)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
21 of
32)
81%
(
13 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
59%
(
13 of
22)
50%
(
2 of
4)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
21%
(
11 of
52)
Rtn Points Won
37%
(
20 of
54)
61
Total Points Won
45
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
Q1 |
Yuki Naito
Player
Richel Hogenkamp
63%
(
33 of
52)
1st Serve %
62%
(
34 of
55)
2
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
1
82%
(
27 of
33)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
21 of
34)
58%
(
11 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
11 of
21)
38%
(
3 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
27%
(
14 of
52)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
23 of
55)
61
Total Points Won
46
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
QF |
Anastasia Tikhonova
Player
Richel Hogenkamp
50%
(
30 of
60)
1st Serve %
50%
(
26 of
52)
5
Aces
1
6
Double Faults
5
80%
(
24 of
30)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
14 of
26)
43%
(
13 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
10 of
26)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
38%
(
23 of
60)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
28 of
52)
65
Total Points Won
47
|
6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
R2 |
Richel Hogenkamp
Player
Ekaterina Reyngold
59%
(
54 of
91)
1st Serve %
66%
(
59 of
89)
1
Aces
2
8
Double Faults
6
65%
(
35 of
54)
1st Serve Won
51%
(
30 of
59)
51%
(
19 of
37)
2nd Serve Won
60%
(
18 of
30)
38%
(
6 of
16)
Break Points Won
38%
(
3 of
8)
41%
(
37 of
91)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
41 of
89)
95
Total Points Won
85
|
6-4 4-6 6-1 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Richel Hogenkamp
Player
Ekaterina Kazionova
61%
(
38 of
62)
1st Serve %
67%
(
42 of
63)
2
Aces
2
4
Double Faults
9
50%
(
19 of
38)
1st Serve Won
48%
(
20 of
42)
50%
(
12 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
10 of
21)
38%
(
6 of
16)
Break Points Won
40%
(
4 of
10)
50%
(
31 of
62)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
33 of
63)
64
Total Points Won
61
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
R3 |
Carol Zhao
Player
Richel Hogenkamp
63%
(
57 of
90)
1st Serve %
62%
(
61 of
98)
-
Aces
-
7
Double Faults
4
58%
(
33 of
57)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
38 of
61)
58%
(
19 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
49%
(
18 of
37)
31%
(
4 of
13)
Break Points Won
33%
(
3 of
9)
42%
(
38 of
90)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
42 of
98)
94
Total Points Won
94
|
6-2 2-6 6-4 | H2H | ||
R2 |
Richel Hogenkamp
Player
Christina Rosca
63%
(
37 of
59)
1st Serve %
64%
(
32 of
50)
-
Aces
-
3
Double Faults
3
59%
(
22 of
37)
1st Serve Won
38%
(
12 of
32)
59%
(
13 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
56%
(
10 of
18)
100%
(
5 of
5)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
41%
(
24 of
59)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
28 of
50)
63
Total Points Won
46
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
QF |
Linda Fruhvirtova
Player
Richel Hogenkamp
60%
(
31 of
52)
1st Serve %
62%
(
39 of
63)
4
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
4
94%
(
29 of
31)
1st Serve Won
49%
(
19 of
39)
33%
(
7 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
12 of
24)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
31%
(
16 of
52)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
32 of
63)
68
Total Points Won
47
|
6-3 6-1 | H2H | ||
R2 |
Richel Hogenkamp
Player
Salma Djoubri
61%
(
47 of
77)
1st Serve %
61%
(
58 of
95)
1
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
3
66%
(
31 of
47)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
37 of
58)
50%
(
15 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
12 of
37)
42%
(
5 of
12)
Break Points Won
33%
(
3 of
9)
40%
(
31 of
77)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
46 of
95)
92
Total Points Won
80
|
7-6(5) 6-3 | H2H |
view more